Top court clears way for suing police

Lawsuits against police and police-related pertinent court decisions.

Top court clears way for suing police

Postby Thomas » Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:14 pm

Top court clears way for suing police; men waited until criminal charges over

TORONTO — Canada’s top court has paved the way for a pair of separate civil lawsuits to proceed by affirming earlier rulings that two men alleging police assaulted them were justified in waiting for their criminal proceedings to end before suing.

In decisions released on Thursday, the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear appeals by police in Woodstock, Ont., who argued the plaintiffs had waited too long to sue them.

In both cases, judges initially threw out the claims on the basis that the clock had started running on the date the plaintiffs were arrested and allegedly assaulted. However, those decisions were overturned on appeal, prompting the police to ask the Supreme Court to intervene.

The first case involved Robert Winmill, who police charged with assaulting an officer and resisting arrest after a struggle at his home on June 1, 2014. He was acquitted of both charges in February 2016 and issued his notice of action against the officers for battery on June 2, 2016 — a day outside the legally prescribed two-year window.

Police successfully argued before a judge that Winmill had filed his battery claim too late after the alleged assault. On appeal, however, a majority of Ontario’s highest court found the limitations period had only begun on the date of his acquittal.

“The criminal charges of assault and resisting arrest against the appellant and his tort claim of battery against the respondents are, in reality, two sides of the same coin or mirror images of each other,” the Court of Appeal ruled in a split decision last December. “It made sense for him to postpone deciding whether to make a battery claim against the respondents until his criminal charges for assault and resisting arrest were resolved.”

In a minority opinion, a dissenting justice who called the case “straightforward” said he would have dismissed Winmill’s appeal on the grounds that he had all the necessary information to sue as of the date he was injured, but had delayed for “tactical reasons.”

The second case involved Everton Brown, who was injured in a struggle when Woodstock police arrested him on Feb. 13, 2013, and charged him with criminal offences including drug charges and resisting arrest. At trial in October 2015, the prosecution withdrew the charges in exchange for a peace bond.

Brown filed a suit against police on May 13, 2016, more than three years after the initial incident, alleging battery, illegal search, wrongful arrest and detention, various related charter breaches and malicious prosecution.

As in the Winmill case, police were initially successful in arguing Brown had waited too long but again, the province’s top court overturned the ruling on appeal in March. Although different charges were involved in the two cases and Brown entered a peace bond as opposed to being acquitted, the Appeal Court said those factors were irrelevant.

“The key point is that, as in Winmill, the battery action is essentially a mirror image of the criminal charge the appellant was facing,” the Appeal Court ruled. “As a result, it was open to the appellant to await the outcome of the criminal proceedings against him before finally deciding whether to bring his action, regardless of when he first formed the intention to sue.”

https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/c ... arges-over
Thomas, Administrator

User avatar
Thomas
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1567
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:18 pm
Location: Canada

Return to Lawsuits Against Police

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron